Legal Opinion

Annet Godiksen v. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided September 17, 2026No. 3:23-cv-03223Unknown

1Opinion

Inursday, 17 september, 2UzZ0 □□□□□□□ | Clerk, U.S. District Court, IL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ANNET GODIKSEN, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 23-cv-3223 ) ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Defendant. ) OPINION COLLEEN R. LAWLESS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Annet Godiksen filed a Complaint asserting claims under the anti- retaliation provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging her former employer, Defendant Iinois Environmental Protection Agency (“IEPA”), retaliated against her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Boss v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Alfredo Abrego v. Robert WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Chrissie Washington v. Illinois Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Rasul Freelain v. Village of Oak ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API