Legal Opinion

Yerby v. Heineken & Vogelsang

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1919No. 6050PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Runnels County; J. O. Woodward, Judge. Action by Heineken & Vogelsang and others against J. J. Yerby, in which Sorrels & Co. were permitted to intervene. From judgment for interveners, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

This suit was originally brought by Heineken & Vogelsang against appellants, Rasbury and Yerby, upon an account consisting of a number of items growing out of the same transaction, wherein Heineken & Vogelsang, as brokers, sold for appellants a certain lot of cotton to a firm in Bremen, Germany. The account sued on was shown as an exhibit to the petition, with the charges against appellants aggregating $86,575.61, and credits aggregating $84,996.-57, leaving an amount claimed by plaintiffs of $1,580.04. Appellants answered by general denial, and specially denied several items in the account,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Linn v. ArambouldTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Gullett v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Riddle v. BeardenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Carlton v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowie Sewerage Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Leath v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API