Legal Opinion
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 8, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2016-1534Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE, Plaintiff, and CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, Plaintiff-Intervenor, et al., v. Civil Action No. 16-1534 (JEB) (and Consolidated Case Nos. 16-267 and 16-1769) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Defendant, and DAKOTA ACCESS, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor and Cross- Claimant. MEMORANDUM OPINION For three years, this Court has presided over a dispute regarding the legality of the construction and operation of the Dakota Access Pipeline. In 2017, it remanded several National Environmental Policy Act issues to the Army Corps…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Pacific Shores Subdivision California Water District v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., a Non-Profit New York Corporation v. Russell E. Train, Administrator of Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.