Legal Opinion

State v. Mulder

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 2011No. 2011-KA-0424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWIN A. LOMBARD, Judge.

liThe defendant/appellant Derrick Mulder pleaded guilty to possession of heroin, a violation of La.Rev.Stat. 40:966(A)(1), but reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence pursuant to State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La. 1976). After review of the record in light of the applicable law and arguments of the parties, we reverse the ruling of the trial court, vacate the defendant’s guilty plea and sentence, and remand the matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

Relevant Facts and Procedural History

On August 3, 2010, the defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LamptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  2. State v. LockettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. State v. LamptonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. State v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Foster v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API