Legal Opinion
State v. Thomas
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 2013No. 2012-KA-0852PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge.
11 After entering a guilty plea with a reservation of rights under State v. Crosby,1 defendant, Roland Thomas, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the conviction and remand to the trial court for the imposition of the mandatory fine required by La. R.S. 14:95.1(B).
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant was charged by bill of information with two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, one count of possession of alprazolam (a Schedule IV controlled dangerous substance under La. R.S. 40:964(B)),…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- State v. SURTAINSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- Limagrain Genetics Corp. v. Midwest Oilseeds, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015