Legal Opinion
(PC)Maestas v. Phillips
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 14, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00893Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RANDY MAESTAS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00893-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CASE, WITH PREJUDICE, BASED 13 BRYAN D. PHILLIPS, ON CLAIM PRECLUSION AND FRIVOLOUSNESS 14 Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 14 15 DAYS 16 (ECF No. 1) 17 18 Plaintiff Randy Maestas is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 5). Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 20 14, 2023, alleging…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.