Legal Opinion
General Time Corp. v. Padua Alarm Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 17, 1952No. 217, Docket 22281PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
tjttp r*rn?TAi\/r PER CURIAM.
Though the court is divided in its views nonetheless there is sufficient agree-ment among its members to permit the dis-position of the case without remand. Judge CHASE and Judge CLARK, though of different opinions as to the merits of the contraversy> agree that the court has jurisdictlonto declde the case on its merits and that the Provisions of Rule 54(b), Fed.Rules Civ. Proc-> 28 U-S-C> relatlnS to judgment upon multiple claims are inapplicable. Judge BIGGS> while voting with Judge CLARK on ^ ments> 13 of the Vlew ^ the aourt *s without power to entertain the…
2Cited by22 opinions
- J.B.C. Lockwood, Jr., Successor to Sanford M. Sage, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Emerald Properties, Inc. v. The Wolf Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Lloyd Wescott v. Impresas Armadoras, S.A. Panama v. Brady Hamilton Stevedore Co., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Reddi-Wip, Inc. v. Lemay Valve CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Luithle v. TavernaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.