Legal Opinion
Luithle v. Taverna
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1973No. Civ. 8835PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNUDSON, Judge.
Jack Luithle brought this action for the recovery of damages for losses sustained to his herd of cattle by the introduction of a disease, leptospirosis, which he claims came from 31 head of cattle infected with the disease brought to his feedlot from the yards of the Minot Livestock Auction and purchased by Jack Taverna and Jarold Frazer for Swift & Company to fill out a contract between Luithle and Swift & Company for the feeding of 500 cattle. Subsequent to the bringing of the action, the plaintiff, Luithle, died, and Melinda Luithle and Orin W. Reiser, co-administrators of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierce v. Ford Motor Co. Mahone v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Wolff v. LightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Titus v. TitusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. American Motors Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Stewart v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Hummel v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Perius v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Minch v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.