Legal Opinion
People v. Stehman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 30, 2001No. 2-00-0687 RelPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Byrne
Defendant, Michael Stehman, was arrested for unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia (720 ILCS 600/3.5(a) (West 1998)). Defendant moved to suppress evidence and quash his arrest. This motion was granted. The State now appeals pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(1) (188 Ill. 2d R. 604 (a)(1)). We affirm.
At the hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress evidence and quash his arrest, defendant testified that he was working at a pizza restaurant in Sandwich on January 13, 2000. Defendant was returning to the restaurant at around 5 p.m. after making deliveries. As defendant pulled into the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- People v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Glasco v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. StehmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. GantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- People v. PartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
- People v. StehmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. StehmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.