Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Hernandez

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided June 9, 2008No. 07-91687PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERALD D. FINES, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter having come before the Court on a Motion to Vacate Order Confirming Plan filed by Creditor, Capital One Auto Finance, Debtors’ Objection to Claim #6 Filed by Capital One Auto Finance, and Response to Objection to Claim; the Court, having heard arguments of counsel and reviewed the written memoranda of the parties and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 7052 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

Findings of Fact

The material facts in this matter are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. PeasleeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
  2. In Re SandersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
  3. In Re WestfallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. In Re CohrsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2007
  5. In Re BlakesleeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re BrodowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  2. GMAC v. Mancini (Mancini)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. In Re HowardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  4. In Re MoreyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  5. In Re WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API