Legal Opinion

Homebuilders Ass'n v. Metro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 2002No. 2001-197; A118382Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioner seeks review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) final opinion and order affirming a Metropolitan Service District (Metro) ordinance amending its Regional Framework Plan (RFP) and the Metro Code (MC). The amended provisions specify the available processes for changing the Metro Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The effect of the amendments is that only Metro may initiate a change in the UGB to accommodate housing needs. Petitioner challenges LUBA’s conclusion that the new enactments do not violate certain constitutional, statutory, and regulatory requirements. We affirm.

The basic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Anderson v. PedenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Neuberger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API