Legal Opinion
Majors v. Kalo Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided October 2, 1975No. Civ. A. 75-187-NPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VARNER, District Judge.
There are now presented to this Court issues concerning the conscionability or unconscionability under the applicable provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code of certain limitations or exclusions of consequential damages in connection with the sale of the soybean inoculant product Triple Noctin manufactured by Defendant, Kalo Laboratories, Inc. [hereinafter Kalo], and sold to Plaintiff by Defendant, Helena Chemical Company [hereinafter Helena]. The conscionability of these exclusions, more particularly described hereinafter, has been drawn into issue by the third…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Housing Authority of Birmingham Dist. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Republic Steel Corporation v. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Smith v. KennedyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- M/V American Queen v. San Diego Marine Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Latimer v. William Mueller & Son, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. AlterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.