Legal Opinion

State v. Victoroff

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 1989No. J87-1933, J87-2277, J87-1934, J87-2284, J87-2066, J87-2285; CA A46680PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant pled guilty to fraudulent use of a credit card, ORS 165.055, two counts of theft II, ORS 164.045, and attempted fraudulent use of a credit card. ORS 161.405(1). The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on five years’ probation, one condition of which is that he submit to polygraph examinations. He appeals, 1 and we affirm.

Defendant assigns as error the imposition of the polygraph examination condition. He argues that it exceeds the court’s authority in the light of State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984). See also State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221, 744…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. LyonOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. GravilleOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. GravilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API