General Crushed Stone Co. v. State

GfiBson, P. J., and Taylor, J.

(dissenting). The lucid opinion of Mr. Justice Sohxrxok at Trial Term (46 Misc 2d 266) seems to us to present an accurate analysis of the issues and to reach the correct conclusions and determination; and we write only in outline and merely to place somewhat greater emphasis on the element of fraudulent concealment, which seems to us to have been well established.

It is clear that General and Central evolved what must have initially appeared to have been a mutually advantageous arrangement whereby General sold its product to Central at preferential prices, thereby…