Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Gillette Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 20, 1981No. 80 C 4415PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Paul C. Fisher (“Fisher”) has sued The Gillette Company (“Gillette”), charging that Gillette’s Eraser Mate pen infringes Fisher’s 1969 United States Patent No. 3,425,779 (the “Fisher Patent”) covering a “Pressurized Marking Instrument” (in common parlance, a bail-point pen). Hallmark Cards, Inc. (“Hallmark”), which has been Fisher’s exclusive licensee since 1974, seeks to intervene as a third-party plaintiff against Fisher and as a co-plaintiff with Fisher against Gillette. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Clark v. Sandusky Appeal of De RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  5. Crane Company v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melcher v. Central States Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  2. OsteoMed LLC v. Stryker CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API