Legal Opinion

Herrly v. Muzik

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 27, 1985No. C1-84-307PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

Petitioners-defendants, liquor vendors and their owners, seek further review of a decision of the Court of Appeals reversing the summary judgment entered in their favor by the trial court. The Court of Appeals held that the 1977 amendment to the Civil Damage Act, Minn.Stat. § 340.95, altered prior law by making “complicity” a fault to be compared with that of others, rather than an absolute bar to recovery in a Dram Shop action. We reverse.

The plaintiff Kenneth Herrly was severely injured on April 18, 1981 while a passenger in a truck driven by Steven Muzik, when the latter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Robinson v. LamottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Turk v. Long Branch Saloon, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Anderson v. MoulderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Craig v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Baxter Ex Rel. Estate of Baxter v. NoceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API