Legal Opinion

State v. Vanburen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 14, 2014No. 11CR0094; A148781PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a Schedule I controlled substance, ORS 475.840. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a war-rantless search of a closed bag that was located several feet outside of the entrance to his apartment. The state argued that the search was lawful under State v. Pidcock, 306 Or 335, 759 P2d 1092 (1988), cert den, 489 US 1011 (1989), because the police reasonably believed that the bag was lost property and conducted the search to ascertain the identity of the bag’s owner.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. KleinOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Gaona v. BLACKETTEROregon Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API