Legal Opinion

Committee for New Management of Guaranty Bancshares Corp. v. Dimeling

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 91-0253PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAHN, District Judge.

In this securities action, the plaintiffs have alleged that the defendants committed fraud in connection with a proxy contest held in December, 1990. The plaintiffs seek to be installed on the Board of Directors of Guaranty Bancshares Corporation (“Guaranty”). The court has held a number of evidentiary hearings, and the parties have submitted pre- and post-trial briefs. Upon consideration of the evidence introduced at the hearings and the briefing of the parties, I make the following

I. FINDINGS OF FACT1

A. The Parties

1. The plaintiffs are:

a. The Committee for New…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. Wells Fargo BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Coretsky v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Gail M. Kranson, Administratrix of the Estate of Harry Gritz, Deceased v. Valley Crest Nursing Home, A/K/A Luzerne County Institution DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Italo Petroleum Corp. of America v. Producers Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. COM. FOR NEW MGT. OF GUAR. BANCSHARES CORP. v. DimelingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API