Legal Opinion
Ziegler v. Findlay Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 30, 2006No. 3:04 CV 7302PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZOUHARY, District Judge.
Plaintiff makes four claims: negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, violation of Ohio Rev.Code § 1701.93, and breach of good faith. This Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiffs claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 exclusive of interest and costs, and the parties are citizens of different states.
Facts
Findlay Industries, Inc. is a privately held company headquartered in Ohio that provides parts to the auto industries in the United States, Mexico and Europe. In 2002, Findlay experienced financial…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. First Bank of WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Doe v. SexSearch. ComCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Doe v. SexSearch. ComDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund v. Standard & Poor's Financial Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Olympic Holding Co., L.L.C. v. Ace Ltd., 07ap-168 (12-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.