Legal Opinion
Teknowledge Corp. v. Cellco Partnership
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 18, 2009No. C 08-3063 SIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On May 15, 2009, the Court held a hearing on defendant’s motion for summary judgment that all asserted claims of the '175 patent are invalid. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Teknowledge Corporation alleges that defendant Célico Partnership d/b/a/ Verizon Wireless infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,029,175 (“the '175 patent”), titled “Automatic Retrieval of Changed Files By A Network Software Agent.” The '175 patent, in general, relates to methods…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DeLorme Publishing Co. v. Briartek IP, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014