Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Houston

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 7, 2004No. 02-5831Published

1DissentHaynes, District Judge

I respectfully dissent. Of the issues presented, four errors,1 when considered cumulatively, rendered the Defendant’s trial fundamentally unfair. These errors, in essence, are: (1) the district court’s judicial notice of “gangsta rap” and its failure to conduct a complete voir dire of all prospective jurors regarding any opinions or prejudices against “gangsta rap”; (2) the government counsel’s reference to the title of the Defendant’s song “Murderers and Robbers” during the cross-examination of a defense witness in violation of his pretrial agreement on this subject; (3) the district court’s…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API