Rogers v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of first degree rape (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-3401 [Supp. 1973]) and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment in the State Department of Correction. For reversal of that judgment appellant first contends that the trial court erred in not allowing sufficient voir dire examination by his defense counsel to permit an intelligent exercise of his right to make an informed decision whether to challenge the veniremen peremptorily or for cause.
The purpose of voir dire examination is to provide the litigants sufficient information about the proposed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- James Dean Walker v. O. E. Bishop, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Michael McCray v. Robert AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Beed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.