Legal Opinion

Vasquez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1985No. B14-84-304-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.

Appellant pled not guilty to the offense of possession of methaqualoné, a controlled substance, with intent to deliver. He waived his right to a jury trial and was found guilty by the court. Punishment was assessed at ten years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. We affirm.

On October 20, 1983, Officer Zink of the Pasadena Police Department received a tip from a confidential informant, who had given reliable information in the past, telling him that the appellant would engage in a drug transaction involving methaqualone and that the transaction would…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Nastu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wallace v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1996
  2. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Lunde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Cassanova v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Barnes, Brydrick Earl v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API