Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Just
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
In this will construction case, the trial court ruled that the appellants, descendants of the testator, had been disinherited. The two fundamental points raised on appeal are: that any language of intent to disinherit was totally enervated by appearing only in inoperative provisions of the will; that disinheritance of an heir does not serve to disinherit the heir’s descendants. We affirm.
The dramatis personae is a prolix maze due to the number and similarity of names, making a clear statement of facts a difficult task. We scorecard the cast of parties as follows:
Cornelius A. Just…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. BinowitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Boxley v. EasterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Adams v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- In Re Estate of StengelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Meyer v. BradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of Pettit v. LevineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- American Cancer Society, St. Louis Division v. HammersteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Estate of Heisserer v. LoosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- AMERICAN CANCER SOC., ETC. v. HammersteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Centerre Trust Co. of St. Louis v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988