Legal Opinion

Haft v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1964No. 36516PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiff (appellant), the operator of a power shovel owned by Kitsap County, was injured when the shovel was struck by defendant’s (respondent’s) train at a private crossing. Following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and in the alternative for a new trial. Plaintiff appeals from this ruling.

This action was consolidated for trial with two other actions arising out of the same accident; the county’s action against the railroad, and the railroad’s action against the county, for property damage to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Moore v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Smith v. McDanielWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. McBeath v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Young v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Bunch v. King County Department of Youth ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bunch v. KING COUNTY DEPT. OF YOUTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Daly v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Hoops v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API