Legal Opinion

Fenson v. State Liquor Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

The petitioner applied for a license to sell liquor at retail at 182 Clinton street, Binghamton, N. Y. The Broome County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, hereinafter called the “ county board,” disapproved said application, saying: “ Too many stores in this vicinity. Brothers of applicant are beer distributors (Co-Operating Distributing Co.) and subterfuge is suspected in this case.” On petitioner’s application for a rehearing or review the New York State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, hereinafter called the “ State board,” concurred in the action of the county board and disapproved…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Reuther v. SissonNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In re of the Estate of SouthardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Casciato v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Cox v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Fenson v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Wilson v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Sussman v. NappyNew York Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API