Legal Opinion

FT Peck Tribes v. Stafne

Fort Peck Appellate Court

Decided February 14, 2002No. 351PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARY P. SULLIVAN, Chief Justice.

The Tribal Prosecutor appeals from a bench trial judgment of not guilty, the Honorable Marvin Youpee, presiding. The denial of the prosecution’s motion for continuance based on the Tribes’ failure to summons a key witness was an abuse of discretion by the Trial Court. We reverse and remand.

BRIEF FACTUAL OVERVIEW AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On February 25, 2000, Joe Beston Sr. reported that two males had broken into a house being renovated which was located at 322 Helena Street, Wolf Point, MT. *231Beston become aware of the incident and called the Tribal Police…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. Fort Peck TribesFort Peck Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Fort Peck Tribes v. MireauFort Peck Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Rios v. LilleyFort Peck Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API