Legal Opinion

Fort Peck Tribes v. Mireau

Fort Peck Appellate Court

Decided February 22, 2002No. 355Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARY P. SULLIVAN, Chief Justice.

This matter alises from an order of dismissal of a criminal complaint “without prejudice” due to failure of service of two material prosecution witnesses. The factual and legal setting is essentially the same as in Tribes v. Stafne, FPCOA # 351, 2002 WL 34432657, 4 Am. Tribal Law 230 (2002).

On the day of trial, two of the prosecution’s material witnesses had not been served and were not, present. The Tribal Prosecutor requested a continuance and the defendant made a motion to dismiss. The Tribal Court dismissed the matter without stating its legal basis…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. FT Peck Tribes v. StafneFort Peck Appellate Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API