Legal Opinion

John C. Echols and Deanna O. Echols v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 15, 1991No. 90-4231PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners, John C. Echols (Echols) and his wife, Deanna 0. Echols (collectively, Taxpayers), appeal from that portion of the decision of the United States Tax Court which held that Taxpayers were not entitled to claim a deduction in 1976 under 26 U.S.C. Section 165(a) (§ 165(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended (I.R.C.) and in effect for the years at issue in this case) on the basis of abandonment. The tax court found that the Taxpayers had failed to establish that they had abandoned their partnership interest in 1976, or that the partnership had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Freeland v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  2. Hopkins v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  3. John A. Laney and Jeanine Laney v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Denman v. BrumbackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  5. Middleton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Citron v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  2. Trigon Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  3. Harvey L. Tucker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Pilgrim's Pride Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  5. Whittington v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API