Legal Opinion

OFFINEER v. Kelly

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 24, 2010No. Case 09CV493Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Detective Roger Kelly and Sheriff Matt Lutz’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Qualified Immunity (Doc. 32) and Plaintiff Corey Offineer’s Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Defendant Kelly — Fifth Amendment Violations (Doc. 45). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Plaintiffs Cross Motion is DENIED.

II. BACKGROUND

A. SEXUAL ASSAULT REPORTED

On May 30, 2006, Christine Robbins and Michael Offineer took their…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API