Legal Opinion

Sand v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1988No. 15729PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLSTEIN, Chief Judge.

Movant Martin Sand appeals from a denial without evidentiary hearing of his motion under former Rule 27.26.1 Movant filed his post-conviction motion on November 18, 1987. The court below is accused of error because (1) movant’s Rule 27.26 *98motion sufficiently alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) the court below failed to address all issues raised in the Rule 27.26 motion, and (3) the Rule 27.26 motion adequately alleged violation of mov-ant’s rights of due process and equal protection of the law resulting in an unfair trial and such claims are not refuted by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seltzer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Mercer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Malone v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Ahart v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. SandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spencer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Rippee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API