Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fischer v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 17, 2009No. 100,248Published

1DissentLeben, J.

Sometimes our citizens get frustrated with how far we go to protect the rights of criminal defendants. But when constitutional rights or core due-process principles are at stake, there may be no room for compromise. This is not such a case.

The question before us is whether a district judge may use his or her judgment to decide whether to bring a convicted murderer hundreds of miles to appear personally for an evidentiary hearing on a habeas corpus claim or whether the judge may have the defendant participate by telephone. I see no reason to remove the exercise of sound judgment in answering…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Ex Parte MinesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Lujan v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Pabst v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API