Legal Opinion
In Re FORFEITURE OF $176,598
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 2000No. Docket 209814PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, P.J.
Claimant, Nathaniel Wilson, appeals by delayed leave granted from the trial court order denying his request for statutory interest on a judgment ordering the return of funds seized twelve years ago under the controlled substance forfeiture statute, MCL 333.7521; MSA 14.15(7521), and in the custody of the city of Detroit. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The following summary of the facts of this case is taken from In re Forfeiture of $176,598, 443 Mich 261, 262-263; 505 NW2d 201 (1993):
On December 17, 1986, two Detroit police officers responded to an activated residential…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Goins v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re Forfeiture of $176,598Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Old Orchard by the Bay Associates v. Hamilton Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Forfeiture of $176,598Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
- People Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. $176,598.00 US CurrencyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Sloan v. Finsilver Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Wrench LLC v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003