In Re Forfeiture of $176,598
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.
We must determine whether the Court of Appeals erroneously reversed a trial court’s denial of a forfeiture claimant’s motion for summary disposition. Because the police officers’ entry of the claimant’s residence was constitutional pursuant to the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement, we reverse and remand to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
On December 17, 1986, two Detroit police officers responded to an activated residential security alarm on Corbett Street. Upon their arrival, the officers checked the residence and its…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. SniderMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. KazmierczakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. BarbarichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. SlaughterMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.