Legal Opinion

Greear v. Paust

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1938No. 31,658Published

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This was a suit to recover $21,875 and interest, upon the theory that the defendant, with constructive notice of the fact that certain Canadian lands were held in trust for the plaintiff, had purchased the same from plaintiff’s mother, subject to an outstanding contract for deed to the Moose Mountain Fur Ranches, Ltd. and had received $21,875, the contract price, from that company when it fulfilled its contract and took title to the land. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and this appeal is taken from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Greear v. PaustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. State v. McGrortySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API