Legal Opinion
A.L. Blades & Sons, Inc. v. Yerusalim
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 10, 1996No. 4:CV-94-2033PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MeCLURE, District Judge.
BACKGROUND:
This case requires the court to determine whether a statute that requires contractors to hire Pennsylvania residents to work on state-funded public works violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Constitution of the United States. Plaintiffs, a highway construction contractor and two of its employees, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on December 16, 1994. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff contractor was awarded a contract for road construction within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, but later was informed that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- A.L. Blades & Sons, Inc. v. YerusalimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997