John Teske v. Wilson Mutual Insurance Company

*218 ¶1 The petitioner, Wilson Mutual Insurance Company (Wilson), seeks review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals reversing the circuit court's order that determined the Teskes' claims were barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. Wilson contends that the circuit court correctly dismissed the Teskes' claims because the claims could have been brought in a prior action between the same parties.

¶2 Specifically, Wilson asserts that claim preclusion applies to bar all of the plaintiffs' claims because all three elements of claim preclusion are established. It contends that the…