Legal Opinion

Moseley v. Grundy County District R-V School

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 2010No. ED 94192PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge.

Introduction

Dr. Robert Moseley (Claimant) appeals pro se from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Commission (Commission), affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal denying him unemployment benefits. We dismiss Claimant’s appeal because his brief fails to comply with Rule 84.04 so substantially that we are unable to review this appeal. 1

Discussion

We hold pro se appellants to the same standards as attorneys regarding Rule 84.04’s mandatory briefing rules. Johnson v. Buffalo Lodging Assocs., 300 S.W.3d 580, 581 (Mo.App. E.D.2009). “While we prefer to dispose…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington v. BlackburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Fritz v. FritzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Lueker v. Missouri Western State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Boyd v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Johnson v. Buffalo Lodging AssociatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Belleview R-III School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. DeWalt v. Davidson Service/Air, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Hamilton v. ArcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State of Missouri, ex rel. Chris Koster v. The Honorable Gary Oxenhandler, Circuit Judge of Callaway County, and Judy Groner, Circuit Clerk Callaway County Circuit CourtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. WCT & D, LLC v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API