Legal Opinion

Steinmetz v. Steinmetz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 8, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

Since about 1928 Frederick W. Steinmetz and Harry G. Steinmetz, brothers, conducted the business of building and repairing machinery at East Portchester in Greenwich under the name of the Steinmetz Machine Works. In 1931 they entered into articles of partnership which included provision that should either partner die during the term of the partnership it should not be deemed dissolved but the assets should pass to the surviving partner, subject, however, to the condition that he should pay to the widow of the deceased partner, so long as she remained single, $50 per week, and in the event…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. . FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. McKinnon v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  3. Joseph v. . HerzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Valentine v. WysorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Sigourney v. MunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WeinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. In re the Estate of HavemeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Emerson v. CampbellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
  4. Emerson v. CampbellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
  5. Steinmetz v. SteinmetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API