Legal Opinion

Valder v. Wallis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1976No. 40201PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

This is an action to quiet title to accretion lands formed by the Missouri River. At the time of the Iowa-Nebraska Boundary Compact of 1943 the land was in Nebraska. By virtue of a shift in the bed of the river, the land, although on the Nebraska side of the boundary line, is on the Iowa side of the river. The defendants own land in Iowa adjoining the property in dispute and claim ownership by adverse possession and accretion. The court decreed a division of the land in accordance with an existing river chute. Defendants appeal. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The law of Iowa…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Durfee v. KeifferNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. EcklundNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ziemba v. ZellerNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Burket v. KrimlofskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1981
  2. Anderson v. CumpstonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Omaha Indian Tribe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Cofer v. KuhlmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Monument Farms, Inc. v. DaggettNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API