Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Bomark Fabrics, Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 23, 1981PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Margaret Taylor, J.

This is a holdover summary proceeding. Respondents move to dismiss on two grounds: that the tenancy is projected by rent stabilization and that, even if it is not so protected, this proceeding was brought while respondent Schwartz was in possession pursuant to a valid lease.

In June, 1976, Ms. Schwartz entered into possession of her current apartment pursuant to a two-year lease which expired on May 31, 1978. In 1978 petitioner offered respondents a choice of a one-, two- or three-year renewal *813lease. Respondents chose, and entered into, a two-year lease…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. La Guardia v. CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Goodman v. RamirezCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979
  3. Schacht v. City of New York Housing & Development AdministrationNew York Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eastern Pork Products Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Pape v. DoarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Romanow v. HellerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
  4. Nelson v. YatesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
  5. 123 East 18th Street Corp. v. GislerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API