Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Heathcott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1957No. Docket 86, Calendar 46,847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

In this case the seller of an old house, on a land contract, filed a bill of complaint for fore closure, to declare the total sum due under the acceleration clause, and to repossess the premises. The purchaser filed a cross bill seeking rescission of the contract on grounds of fraud.

At trial plaintiff proved her case as to the contract and the delinquency thereon. The defendant failed to prove fraud warranting rescission and on appeal abandons that defense. No appeal is taken as to either issue.

"What started out as an ordinary foreclosure proceedings, on appeal took a new twist. For defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartley v. A. I. Rodd Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hanselman v. CarstensMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Spelman v. AddisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McDonald v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. O'Rourke v. DeffenbaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Detroit Pure Milk Co. v. FarnsworthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Lisa Tyra v. Organ Procurement Agency of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Lisa Tyra v. Organ Procurement Agency of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Lisa Tyra v. Organ Procurement Agency of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API