Lisa Tyra v. Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan
Michigan Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partViviano, J.
Two steps forward, one step back. That is how I *95would describe today’s decision. Although it satisfactorily resolves the first issue in these appeals, the Court inexplicably leaves unresolved a compelling threshold issue raised by the plaintiff in Tyra v Organ Procurement Agency of Mich: if she is to be held to procedural requirements, so should defendants. More specifically, plaintiff1 argued in the trial court that defendants waived the MCL 600.2912b notice-waiting-period affirmative defense because they failed to adequately plead it under MCR 2.111(F)(3). The Court of Appeals found merit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Walters v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.