Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Gruhler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1985No. D.D. No. 84-36PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Initially, there is no dispute that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and (6). Relator’s sole objection to the board’s findings and recommendation deals with the recommended sanction of a one-year suspension. The Toledo Bar Association has advocated throughout this entire proceeding that respondent be permanently disbarred or, at the minimum, be indefinitely suspended. Relator characterizes respondent’s conduct as intentional, fraudulent, and amounting to theft from his clients. Respondent, having filed no objections to the board’s report, would accept a one-year suspension or, ideally, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MortonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. BaxterOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LuceyOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API