Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Matter of ALJ

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1992No. C-90-9Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partUrbigkit, Chief Justice

For a different reason than given by Justice Cardine, I cannot join in concurrence with the entire majority opinion. Directly stated, I do not find persons to be constitutionally second-class, or no-class, citizens under either the federal or state constitution when younger than some age limit, which is from time to time readjusted by the legislature to establish the juvenile court jurisdictional age limit by changing the age of majority.

I find no constitutional basis for the conversion of the misdemeanor offense for an adult into a confinement sentence of five days in jail and three years…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API