Legal Opinion

State v. Gutnik

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2010No. 25576PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] A magistrate court convicted Gutnik of possession of marijuana, but acquitted him of possession of drug paraphernalia. Gutnik appealed his conviction to circuit court. He filed a notice of appeal and attached a copy of the judgment, but mistakenly identified the conviction as possession of paraphernalia rather than possession of marijuana. The circuit court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because notices of appeal are to be construed liberally in favor of sufficiency, we hold that the misidentification of the charge in the notice of appeal did not deprive the circuit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mueller v. Cedar Shore Resort, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Greensleeves, Inc. v. SmileySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. Schmaltz v. NissenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. City of Chamberlain v. R.E. Lien, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stock v. GarrettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API