Legal Opinion

Deignan v. Grondalski

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 15, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRuma, J.

This is an action in contract instituted by the plaintiffs, as lessors, to recover rents, restoration expenses and attorneys’ fees under the parties’ Standard Form Commercial Lease. The defendant-lessees denied complaint allegations, and filed a counterclaim for the amount of their security deposit.

Judgment was entered for the plaintiffs in the amount of $18,500.00 for rent, $525.50 for restoration expenses and $2,491.65 for attorneys’ fees. The court also found for the defendants on their counterclaim in the amount of the parties’ $3,000.00 security deposit.

The defendants are now before this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Kennedy Bros. v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Codman v. BeaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Gidwani v. WassermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jerauld v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API