Legal Opinion

People v. Danis

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1973No. Crim. 10868PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant Danis from a judgment of conviction by a jury for violation of section 487, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code (auto theft). Defendant contends that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction by ordering, on motion of the prosecution, that defendant be examined by a court-appointed psychiatrist, that the examination and medical testimony violated defendant’s constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, and that it was reversible error to permit the prosecution to introduce the psychiatric testimony in rebuttal to the defense of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. Jerry Neale AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  4. People v. DitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. In Re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. David L. Murtishaw v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. DE JESUS VERDIN v. Superior Court of Riverside CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API