Legal Opinion

Cox v. BOWMAN ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

This is a suit by the plaintiffs Cox et al., against defendants Bowman, to quiet title to lands described in the complaint, which land, for convenience, the parties have designated as “Blackacre.” A decree was entered quieting plaintiffs’ title, and defendants appeal.

Blackacre is a small area of about one-third of an acre, which is the site of a spring, reservoir and right-of-way from said spring to another tract of about eleven acres, designated by the parties as “White-acre”, where the water is used. Blackacre is alleged and proven to be in the sole and exclusive possession of plaintiffs.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. VehrsOregon Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. PeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Wiley v. BergOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. C & D INV. CO. v. Gulf Transport Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. City of North Bend v. County of CoosOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Ralston v. SpoorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API