State v. Tennin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Kevin Tennin was convicted after a jury trial of first degree burglary, theft, receiving stolen property, and conspiracy. On appeal he argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict, that he was denied a constitutional right to confront an adverse witness, and that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct. We affirm.
FACTS
On the afternoon of January 13, 1988, appellant and S.P. (a juvenile identified as an accomplice in the crimes charged) drove to the vicinity of the Red Cedar Sporting Goods Store in Redwood Falls. Several of appellant’s relatives accompanied them.
After…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Welfare of S.S.E.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001